Call for a 15 minute consult

In the Matter of Jose MARQUEZ CONDE, Respondent

In the Matter of Jose MARQUEZ CONDE, Respondent

BIA Applies Matter of Pickering on a Nationwide Basis

The BIA Sustained the respondent’s appeal and remanded the case to the immigration judge for further proceedings, stating that its holding in Matter of Pickering, regarding the validity of vacated convictions on the basis of a procedural or substantive defect in the underlying proceedings for immigration purposes, is reaffirmed as, and the decision is modified to give it nationwide application. Thus, if a court with jurisdiction vacates a conviction based on a defect in the underlying criminal proceedings, the respondent no longer has a “conviction” within the meaning of section 101(a)(48)(A).

There is a significant distinction between convictions vacated on the basis of a procedural or substantive defect in the underlying proceedings and those vacated because of post-conviction events, such as rehabilitation or immigration hardships. Thus, if a court with jurisdiction vacates a conviction based on a defect in the underlying criminal proceedings, the respondent no longer has a “conviction” within the meaning of section 101(a)(48)(A). If, however, a court vacates a conviction for reasons unrelated to the merits of the underlying criminal proceedings, the respondent remains “convicted” for immigration purposes.

USCIS Interim Decision #3493 Policy Memo

USCIS restates the BIA:

(1) If a court vacates an alien’s conviction for reasons solely related to rehabilitation or immigration hardships, rather than on the basis of a procedural or substantive defect in the underlying criminal proceedings, the conviction is not eliminated for immigration purposes.

Schedule a consultation

SOUTH SAN FRANCISCO OFFICE

1435 Huntington Ave, Suite 336 South San Francisco, CA 94080

SANTA CLARA OFFICE

5201 Great America Parkway, Suite 320 Santa Clara, CA 95054

Call for a 15 minute consult